Archive for April, 2008

banned music

April 23, 2008

For a list of records banned by the BBC and their justifications check out http://www.rocklistmusic.co.uk/banned.html

Richie Kavanagh - “Aon Focal Eile” Banned in Britain because the first syllable of “Focal”, (the Irish for “Word”) sounded too much like “Fuck”...

I won’t torture you by adding the video. If you want to check it out on YouTube feel free. Richie Kavanagh’s contribution to the Irish music scene is infamous. Other hits of his include: “Mickey’s Bucking Ass” and “Pussy Pussy Cat”.

Paul Mc Cartney- Give Ireland Back to the Irish.This was a song he wrote and recorded after Bloody Sunday. Banned for obvious reasons.

Some of the songs on the list are hilarious.

Bitter pills to swallow (preferably not prescribed by NHS)

April 21, 2008

Thank goodness there are celebrities out there who can inform me of the injustice there is in the world. If it were not for these keenly up to date media moguls how would anything good ever happen?

It is with the utmost gratitude that I have to thank the ever so talented singer Joss Stone. Little Miss Stone has highlighted the abhorrent treatment of British Servicemen on their return from Her Majesty’s service. In her youthful modern tone of speech she told the Evening Standard newspaper: “I think the way the Government treats our soldiers is really f***** up. They can go to war and fight for our Queen and country but if they get their leg blown off they come back and are dealing with the NHS.”

“I think the NHS is the best thing about this country, but they should have a right to private treatment paid for by the Government.”

Not only is her impassioned speech endearing but it contains no hint of class elitism whatsoever. Does it?

Indeed the NHS is a fantastic service offered to Britons but we all know that private health care is better and who better to give it to then the military men who so deserve it.

Maybe Joss should be made aware that British Army chief Sir Richard Dannett is to launch a £2m a year service for former UDR and RIR soldiers in an effort to help them adjust to civilian life and cope with the legacy of the troubles. It was after all an incredibly difficult task those loyal sons of Ulster had in defending their sectarian statelet. The amount of suffering caused by the Good Friday Agreement and subsequent loss of a Protestant state for a Protestant people will be a pain that even £2m a year will never be enough to ease the trauma.

Who knows maybe Northern Ireland’s ministers can have a whip round for the Billy Boys who so loyally defended ‘their wee province’?

Bob Geldof and Bono could organise a special concert with concerned personalities such as Joss Stone to create awareness as nobody listens to people with credentials anymore.

Is Judas greater than Jesus?

April 17, 2008

We are familiar with the expressions “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” It’s funny how biblical references become part of everyday speech. It’s somewhat less funny and more disturbing how biblical references sometimes become part of modern day thought and belief. Thank goodness there are some who don’t literally take these ancient misinterpreted texts for truths. As Martin Luther King said “The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.”

SO are we worshiping the wrong guy? Modern day parlance associates the word traitor with the person Judas Iscariot. Thirty pieces of silver is often quoted as the price of betrayal. There are many flaws in the story.

There is an apparent contradiction in the idea of “the betrayal of God“. The main questions seem to be these:

  • Did Judas exist in his time only to betray Jesus just to fulfill the prophecy?
  • Why did Jesus allow Judas to betray him?
    • Was Jesus unable to prevent the betrayal?
    • Did Jesus willingly allow the betrayal to go ahead?
    • Did Jesus actively try to cause the betrayal to happen?
  • Why is it that the ‘villainy’ of Judas becomes greater and more pronounced as one reads from Mark to John?

The early anti-Christian writer Celsus deemed literal readings of the story to be philosophically absurd, especially because Jesus knew about the treason in advance, and told of it openly to all the disciples at the Passover meal, as well as singling out who the traitor would be without attempting to stop him.

The text of the Gospels suggests that Jesus both foresaw and allowed Judas’ betrayal. In April 2006, a Coptic papyrus manuscript titled the Gospel of Judas (see above section) dating back to 200 AD, was translated into modern language, to add weight to the possibility that according to early Christian writings, Jesus may have asked Judas to betray him [3]. While this seems quite at odds with the Gospel of John, where Judas is portrayed as an arch villain, the Gospel of Mark is much more ambiguous and could be considered to be fairly consistent with the stance of the Gospel of Judas on this question.

Philosophical questions

Judas is also the subject of many philosophical writings, including The Problem of Natural Evil by Bertrand Russell and “Three Versions of Judas“, a short story by Jorge Luis Borges. They both allege various problematic ideological contradictions with the discrepancy between Judas’ actions and his eternal punishment.

  • If Jesus foresees Judas’ betrayal, then it may be argued that Judas has no free will, and cannot avoid betraying Jesus. If Judas cannot control his betrayal of Jesus, then he is not morally responsible for his actions. The question has been approached by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica, which differentiates between foreknowledge and predestination, and argues that the omnipotence of the divine is not sufficient grounds for eliminating the existence of free will. Is free will not God’s greatest gift to mankind?
  • If Judas is sent to Hell for his betrayal, and his betrayal was a necessary step in the humanity-saving death of Jesus Christ, then Judas is punished for saving humanity. This goes hand-in-hand with the “free will” argument, and Aquinas’s Summa deals with the issue of free will in demons and other beings instrumental in the life of Jesus that are nevertheless damned.
  • If Jesus only suffered while dying on the cross and then ascended into Heaven, while Judas must suffer for eternity in Hell, then does Judas not suffer much more for the sins of humanity than Jesus? Should his role in the Atonement be that much more significant? As Borges puts it in “Three Versions of Judas“:

“The ascetic, for the greater glory of God, degrades and mortifies the flesh; Judas did the same with the spirit. He renounced honor, good, peace, the Kingdom of Heaven, as others, less heroically, renounced pleasure.”

  • Does Jesus’ plea, “Father forgive them, they know not what they do,” (Luke 23:34) not apply to Judas? Is his atonement insufficient for Judas’ sins?
  • It has been speculated that Judas’ damnation, which seems to be possible from the Gospels’ text, may not actually stem from his betrayal of Christ, but from the despair which caused him to subsequently commit suicide. This position is not without its problems, but it does avoid the paradox of Judas’ predestined act setting in motion both the salvation of all mankind and his own damnation.

The damnation of Judas is not a universal conclusion. The Roman Catholic Church only proclaims individuals’ Eternal Salvation through the Canon of Saints. There is no ‘Canon of the Damned’, nor any official proclamation of the damnation of Judas.

[edit] Motivation

The Kiss of Judas, by Giotto di Bondone

The Kiss of Judas, by Giotto di Bondone

Was the monetary value of 30 pieces of silver the only motivating force for Judas’ actions considering that 30 pieces of silver was also the price one paid for a slave that had been gored by an ox in Old Testament Law? After seeing Jesus’ popularity declining, was Judas’ motivation for handing Jesus over an attempt to force the hand of God into action? Jesus often spoke of creating a kingdom and saving his people. Many times Judas saw Jesus escape capture and stonings. Judas might have been trying to spur Jesus into a war with the Romans by telling them where he was.

The last reading may be plausible if the etymology of “Iscariot” (see below) could be related to Sicarii, a sect of the Zealots committed to the violent overthrow of Rome. If Judas was a Sicarius (which may or may not be historically possible), then it’s possible that he saw Jesus as the Messiah in the fashion expected by the Zealots: a military leader who would defeat and cast out the Romans. If this scenario was the case, then Judas may well have been trying to force Jesus into a position where he had to reveal himself as the divinely appointed warrior-king who would destroy his enemies.

In conclusion Judas Iscariot was not spurred by Satan as was written by Luke 21:37-22:6 “Then Satan entered Judas, called Iscariot, one of the Twelve.” It was against Satan’s wish for Jesus to fulfill his story and save humanity by dying on the cross. Therefore why would he want Jesus to be betrayed.

The gospels are flawed and it could well be that Jesus and Judas were in ca-hoots. If this were to be the case- Jesus got all the glory and Judas took the flack. In my view Judas’ sacrifice is greater than that of “The Messiah”.

(Some information obtained from wikidpedia)

Our Northern Brethren

April 17, 2008

Once again the manifestation of Ireland’s ills are laid bare in the sporting arena. The old age problem of sectarianism was highlighted in the recent clash between Linfield supporters and members of the Gardai Suiochana. Despite the politicians seemingly manage to get along- some are struggling to keep up with the rapid rate of maturity that their political leaders had for so long been lacking.

The amalgamation of The Ulster Cycling Federation with the Northern Ireland Cycling Federation into Cycling Ulster has been a positive step in the right direction towards eliminating sectarianism and politics in sport in Ulster. It’s a pity the FAI and Northern Ireland FA don’t have (excuse the pun)the balls to (again excuse the terminology) tackle the issues.

The Irish rugby team can play together, why not the soccer team? Too often sport gives a voice to a minority of idiots who want to vent their twisted ideas onto a public stage. My message to them is to grow up. There is no room for sectarianism in sport or indeed society.

Link:ww.independent.ie/sport/soccer/ugly-face-of-football-as-violence-flares-at-crossborder-clash-1349190.html

Seik Heil

April 16, 2008

The article below was taken from the BBC. However this video was crudely made not by a resurrected Joseph Goebbles but by a modern day equivalent. Check it out. If you dare!!

I don’t think it necessary to explain any more. Just watch and weep.

Style over Substance

April 16, 2008

Taken From the BBC website thanks to http://www.voglioscendere.ilcannocchiale.it/

Italians have fallen for the not-so-subtle charms of Silvio Berlusconi once more.

Always ready to burst into a broad smile or to disarm an adversary with a personalised quip, he has swept up more votes than even he dreamed might be possible.

Silvio Berlusconi

A casa: on TV Mr Berlusconi appears to enjoy himself

His admirers say that he has an innate understanding of the Italian psyche and an almost Midas-like capacity to turn everything he touches to gold.

But, with a vast media empire that spans national TV stations, newspapers, advertising and film, his critics see a far darker figure lurking beneath the sunny surface, someone whose image and message is meticulously created and controlled.

One of Mr Berlusconi’s most outspoken critics is journalist Marco Travaglio, author of a series of controversial books on the media tycoon.

‘Shaping reality’

Mr Berlusconi’s pernicious control of Italy’s most-watched medium - television - Mr Travaglio says, is the key to explaining why Italians succumb time and again.

“He is incredibly good at using TV to alter, hide and change reality, to give people a completely deformed impression of himself,” he explains.

“Only those who read books and newspapers know about and remember the disaster that was his five years in power,” he says.

Mr Berlusconi’s period in office between 2001 and 2006 was Italy’s longest-serving government since World War II.

Silvio Berlusconi appears on television
He’s not the only one to enjoy the limelight - I know 57 million other Italians who enjoy it too
Clemente Mimun, Mediaset

Mr Berlusconi, he says, has been very adept at shaping reality to suit his own ends: “Italy has been living in a Truman Show for almost 20 years now.

“Berlusconi is the main character, the screenwriter, the cameraman, the light technician… it’s very difficult, living within his Truman Show, to be able to see its negative and grotesque aspects.”

But for Clemente Mimun, head of the daily Tg5 news programme at Mr Berlusconi’s Mediaset company, his friend Silvio’s appeal is far more straight-forward.

“He is seen as a nice guy, he’s successful.

“Berlusconi is a man who has built up businesses, made himself a bit of money and absolutely everything he has turned his hand to has been a success,” he explains by telephone from Milan.

“He is unique, he’s not a television phenomenon, he doesn’t have plastic politics.”

Having the last word

On the small screen, Mr Berlusconi works hard at looking relaxed and is adept at transforming himself from interviewee to television host.

He has a habit, particularly in election campaigns, of turning magician too - pulling tax cuts out of his hat as a final surprise.

But, as Mr Mimun says, there is nothing wrong with enjoying being in the spotlight. Indeed, it is yet another facet of the national character that he shares with many of his electorate, he suggests.

It doesn’t matter what actually happens in Italy. All that matters is what he [Berlusconi] wants you to know
Marco Travaglio

“He’s not the only one to enjoy the limelight - I know 57 million other Italians who enjoy it too,” Mr Mimun says.

“Listen, in 1994 - when he got into politics - he already had a whole series of TV stations - he didn’t need any excuses if he wanted to get on TV.

“You must look beyond the choreography - to his solid political manifesto, his real pragmatism, his successful life. The man is not just good, he is brilliant.”

A career built on managing television networks has made Mr Berlusconi only too aware of the medium’s hold over the Italian electorate.

In the campaign he initially refused to take part in a live, televised head-to-head with his younger rival, Walter Veltroni - whose communication skills he has repeatedly praised - citing Italy’s rules on equal airtime for all parties.

In the end he took part in a “virtual dual”. Both candidates were interviewed in the same studio, but separately, one after the other.

Determined to have the very last word, however, Mr Berlusconi leapt up from his white armchair and crossed into vision in the closing moments of the programme.

Much to the consternation of the presenter, he managed to address the camera and tell viewers that voting for his rivals would be a wasted vote.

Information wars

Despite these exuberant moments, Mr Mimun is convinced that the international portrayal of Mr Berlusconi as a buffoon reveals a lack of neutrality.

Silvio Berlusconi appears on Italian television

As a guest, Mr Berlusconi is often tempted to seize control

“When I hear about an English newspaper criticising Berlusconi I do wonder if an Italian newspaper article lambasting Gordon Brown would receive as much coverage on British TV,” he says.

Most ordinary Italians, he adds, are a bit puzzled by the foreign media’s obsession with the new prime minister’s ongoing conflict of interests.

“Italians are a strange race. They tell lies when you ask them who they voted for at the exit polls; they don’t admit to looking at horoscopes but then they do; they are all too ready to condemn the system of nepotism but only too happy to use it when it suits them - it’s a dual morality.”

But for Mr Travaglio - banished from state TV Rai during Mr Berlusconi’s previous period in office - it is precisely his control of influential portions of the media that allow him to come back to life, again and again.

“It doesn’t matter what actually happens in Italy,” he says. “All that matters is what he wants you to know.”